Progressive Muslims, edited by Omid Safi, is a collection of fourteen essays by self-identified progressive Muslims. The essays cover three broad topics: contemporary Islam, gender justice, and pluralism. The authors have different and sometimes clashing views about Islam and about what a progressive Muslim is.
The first essay is "The Ugly Modern and the Modern Ugly: Reclaiming the Beautiful in Islam" by Khaled Abou El Fadl. Abou El Fadl is a scholar well-versed in traditional Islam and he takes a somewhat more skeptical view than many of the other authors about some modernist movements within Islam. As I noted in my
Field Guide to Islamic Activists, modernists share some basic ideas and principles with more fundamentalist groups like the Wahhabis - it's their interpretation that differs. Both groups are different from and often opposed to traditionalists in these ideas and princples and that seems to be the reason for Abou El Fadl's skepticism. If Abou El Fadl is a traditionalist, why is he in a volume about progressive Muslims? I didn't realize myself that he took traditionalist views; he's famous (notorious in some circles) for his outspoken liberal critiques of Islamic fundamentalism. Abou El Fadl aims to rediscover liberal views from within the richness of the Islamic tradition of scholarship. If anything, I tend to fall into this camp myself, which is why it's surprising that I didn't like Abou El Fadl's essay more than I did. It struck me that he spent more time criticizing than offering constructive solutions. Anybody can criticize; it's the solutions that we need.
The second essay is "In Search of Progressive Islam Beyond 9/11" by Farid Esack. This essay stands in sharp contrast to the previous one. Esack takes a frankly Marxist perspective. He sees liberal Islam and Progressive Islam as two different things, and liberal Muslims and progressive Muslims as two different groups. And he doesn't think much of liberal Muslims, he sees them as taking an apologetic tone when they should be joining the struggle for economic and social justice against imperialism and capitalism. Liberal Muslims are what many in America want to see. If you're looking for that too, Farid Esack is not your man.
The third essay is "Islam: A Civilizational Project in Progress" by Ahmet Karamustafa. This essay looks at Islam as a religion, a culture, and a civilization, and argues that Islam is best understood as a civilization. This essay is much less provocative than the preceding two. It's more in the way of offering an intellectual framework on which progressive ideals can be hung.
The fourth essay is "The Debts and Burdens of Critical Islam" by Ebrahim Moosa. This essay takes the most modernist view of all the essays so far; the author chose the title phrase "critical Islam" deliberately. While I feel that Moosa has some useful insights to share, I don't take his viewpoint.
The fifth essay is "On Being a Scholar of Islam: Risks and Responsibilities" by Tazim R. Kassam. It's really about the often difficult position scholars of Islam, both Muslim and non-Muslim, have found themselves in since 9/11 and the challenges that they face in explaining Islam in an honest are responsible manner to often hostile audiences.
This concludes the section on progressive Muslims and contemporary Islam. The next set of essays is on gender justice.
The sixth essay is "Transforming Feminism: Islam, Women, and Gender Justice" by Sa'diyya Shaikh. Shaikh criticizes Western feminism for too often engaging in a cultural imperialism of its own and introduces readers to "Third World feminism", which she feels is a better context for understanding and developing Islamic feminism.
The seventh essay is "Progressive Muslims and Islamic Jurisprudence: The Necessity for Critical Engagement with Marriage and Divorce Law" by Kecia Ali. The essay criticizes some well-known liberal Muslim scholars and Muslim feminists for failing to fully escape patriarchal concepts and interpretations from traditional scholarship. The essay is particularly interesting for her survey and examination of Islamic legal texts from the 800s C.E. and what they say about some issues in marriage and divorce law. For instance, the Hanafi legal school is generally considered the most liberal but it has some very conservative and often rigid positions, while the Hanbali school is generally considered the most conservative yet it is the only one of the four schools that would allow the integration of one of the key reforms urged by Muslim feminists. Ali does not agree with the traditionalist views but points out that feminists will not get very far in implementing their reforms if they can't address and respond to the issues raised by traditionalists.
The eighth essay is "Sexuality, Diversity and Ethics in the Agenda of Progressive Muslims" by Scott Siraj al-Haqq Kugle. This will be by far the most controversial essay in the book because it deals with homosexuality and presents Kugle's re-interpretation of Islamic sources in a gay-positive manner. Kugle does present some useful material from classical sources about the story of the prophet Lot, which most Muslims give a very narrow and superficial interpretation of, and he raises some good points, but his juridical arguments are weak and footnote 58 betrays such a gross ignorance of the history of Islamic jurisprudence that I would suggest that Kugle go back to school. Basically, Kugle suffers from the same problem that Kecia Ali was discussing in the previous essay: his interpretation is not likely to be convincing to anybody who is not already predisposed to it because it fails to engage the long tradition of Islamic jurisprudence.
The ninth essay is "Are We Up to the Challenge? The Need for a Radical Re-Ordering of the Islamic Discourse on Women" by Gwendolyn Zoharah Simmons. Simmons writes from a radical feminist Sufi perspective and also relates her views to her experiences as part of the civil rights movement in the late 1960s. One thing that may turn readers off is how Simmons apparently compares the experience of Muslim women everywhere to the Jim Crow South - even Muslim women in America. By failing to acknowledge the great variety and diversity of Muslim women's experience, she risks trivializing some very serious problems, such as in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, and certain other countries. A more nuanced discussion would serve her cause better.
This concludes the section on progressive Muslims and gender justice. The last set of essays is on pluralism.
The tenth essay is "Muslims, Pluralism, and Interfaith Dialogue" by Amir Hussain. This is an excellent introduction to the basis within the Islamic tradition for pluralism and dialogue. Hussain also discusses some problems on the other end: intolerance from Christians and Jews that has in some cases impeded interfaith dialogue.
The eleventh essay is "American Muslim Identity: Race and Ethnicity in Progressive Islam" by Amina Wadud. Wadud, who is African-American, discusses the difficulties between the immigrant Muslim communities and the indigenous African-American Muslim community. This is a topic that I touched on
previously and it is an ongoing serious concern. Two of the books on my reading list deal specifically with the African-American experience of Islam so that I can better understand this problem and join in the search for solutions (my own group, European-American or white Muslims, is so much smaller than the other groups as to be insignificant and there is certainly no "community" of such Muslims).
The twelfth essay is "Islamic Democracy and Pluralism" by Ahmad S. Moussalli. Moussalli looks at various Islamist movements in the Muslim world today and distinguishes between moderate Islamists, who strongly support consultative forms of government (shura), and radical Islamists, who tend to favor authoritarian forms of government. Moussalli encourages the West to work with the moderate Islamists rather than treating them as though they were the same as the radical Islamists; cracking down on them will only radicalize them and other Muslims.
The thirteenth essay is "How to Put the Genie Back in the Bottle? 'Identity' Islam and Muslim Youth Cultures in America" by Marcia Hermansen. Hermansen looks at a growing trend among young American Muslims to treat Islam as a way of asserting an independent identity rather than as a moral and spiritual system, and how this trend can lead to very narrow interpretations of Islam. Hermansen also notes that to a certain extent it's inevitable that teenagers will pass through these phases and that what is really needed is leadership from adults that will guide them through this stage and on to a more mature understanding of Islam.
The fourteenth and last essay is "What is the Victory of Islam? Towards a Different Understanding of the Umma and Political Success in the Contemporary World" by Farish A. Noor. Noor criticizes the tendency, by both Muslims and non-Muslims, towards what he calls "oppositional dialectics", that is, an "us vs. them" mindset. He sees this as the basic problem that limits or prevents dialogue and understanding. He calls for an "Islam without borders". Muslims cannot be concerned only with issues that affect the Muslim community, they need to become actively involved in all movements for social justice and for peace and work together with other people of conscience.
This last essay is in many ways the most similar to "To Be A European Muslim" and is an excellent way to close the book.
Overall, "To Be A European Muslim" clicked with me in a way that this book didn't, probably because it was the work of a single author and long enough to allow a thorough discussion and exploration of the issues. I don't agree with all of the views expressed in "Progressive Muslims" or with all interpretations of Islam that are proposed there. Nonetheless, it was well worth reading and I learned a lot. I recommend this book to anybody who would like to learn more about the different trends for reform within Islam.
Next on the reading list: Islam in the African-American Experience